President-elect Donald Trump has pledged to end daylight savings time in the United States, a move that would significantly impact American life during spring and summer months. This decision has shocked many, including the medical community, who have been advocating for standard time to be adopted permanently due to health concerns associated with daylight savings time. Trump’s proposal has gained support from experts like Dr. Kin Yuen, a neurologist, who sees the potential health benefits of ending daylight savings time.
The debate between daylight savings time and standard time revolves around the impact on public health, including mental health, cardiovascular events, and car crashes. Advocates for standard time argue that it aligns better with the body’s natural circadian rhythm, leading to improved well-being. However, opponents, including some business interests, believe that daylight savings time could boost afterwork commerce and visibility on the roads.
In the past, the U.S. briefly experimented with year-round daylight savings time in the 1970s, but the decision was reversed due to public backlash. Polls have shown varying opinions on the matter, with some supporting daylight savings time and others preferring standard time.
Ultimately, the decision to end daylight savings time and adopt standard time year-round would require widespread infrastructure changes, and political support. While there are conflicting views on the issue, the debate highlights the significant impact that changes in timekeeping practices can have on society.
Photo credit
www.nbcnews.com